In a December article last year, Naval Technology claimed that no country is currently well-equipped or prepared for the challenges of modern seabed warfare. Seabed warfare presents unique operational challenges. She also mentions that slightly bending the cables can allow enough light to leak out for data extraction, with the resulting disruption so indiscernible that it doesn’t register the cables are being tapped.īryan Clark notes in a 2015 report for the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments that the expansion of undersea infrastructure including energy pipelines, undersea communication cables and civilian hydroacoustic sensors has made it imperative to take new forms of encroachment into account when planning for undersea warfare.Ĭlark writes these could include accidental detection by non-military sensors, protection of vital undersea infrastructure and opportunities to inflict damage on enemy undersea infrastructure during a conflict. These tiny devices capture light sent through the cables, copy it and turn it into data without disrupting Internet traffic.
Khazan writes that “intercept probes” could be deployed by agents at cable landing stations. Japan’s energy security woes not easily solved Undersea cables would be vulnerable to attack in any US-China conflict.
0 kommentar(er)
